He concluded that if a person was to account for all the
problems in the world, even just those of living, like, what should one do,
that it would require a person to devote their entire lifetime just to
unraveling each of the ethical knots that a person would be routinely tied in
if those sorts of problems weren’t routinely pushed down to the subconscious
level, or, better yet, never really rising the conscious level because people
weren’t aware that driving a car was problematic on ten sorts of way, but so
was eating fast food, and was it right to give a letter of recommendation to a
person who you didn’t think that much of as a worker but liked personally?
These sorts of things. Anyhow, one can picture the man who’d spend his entire
life just figuring out how to live, brown coat, brown hat, a mutterer. He’d
live alone, or maybe with a cat, and spend long hours walking by the river in
his brown hat and coat, the wind whipping up near his face, trying to figure
out whether it was okay to own a dog, or whether one should take all that money
and love that it takes to keep a dog healthy and happy and give it to his local
Catholic Church. But then, he thinks, what if I did the latter, but I gave it
all to an organization that doesn’t believe in birth control or our current
understanding of the universe. If he was a modern atheist, why, giving money to
the church would be an abomination greater than owning a puppy. Alternatively,
if the church was right, and he walked on ruminating about these things in just
such a way, making it apparent to us all how King Saul just suggested that they
cut the baby in half and was thus declared wise.
It would probably take a lifetime of walking over cobble
stones, across uneven ground, contemplating the scattering of light coming off
the frozen river from weak winter sun, watching the geese fly in V’s overhead,
scanning the strata of clouds for the appearance of an airplane that would
never be boarded or thought of again. That would be the only way. If a person
wasn't to take the word of a man born and died two thousand years ago, or four
thousand, or a man dictating from his hat, or a man from Athens wandering the
streets to give advice, if a person was to cast all these aside and deeply
study and engage with the world around them, create their own set of standards,
not all those standards that go unmentioned, buying electronics that have been
assembled with nearly cheap labor, discarding a phone that will be sifted
through by children in Asia, whether to hold the door open for all five people,
or just one, what is the import of the self? Asking all of these questions and
making an attempt, hell, answering them, answering them all, so that on his
death bed the man with the brown hat would look out the square window in his
house onto the street covered in rain and the caterpillar like blossoms of oaks
piled up in the gutters and know exactly how a person was to expire.
This project would create its own problem to be solved
though, as if a person was to add infinity to one. The next person would have
to consider why exactly a person must spend their whole life thinking about
whether to swat a mosquito that is feasting on your blood if it is one of God’s
creatures, a malaria carrier, or just plain annoying. And, this in and of
itself is a problem, another question to answer. And, if that question has been
unanswered, then the searcher would be forced to reconsider all of the
considerations of the old man in the brown hat, examine them for their
voracity, and in so doing, they’d pass away their life as well, this time
selecting and old rocking chair and a stone hearth, occasionally lit with birch
and dry leaves, and perhaps a dog for company, considering those same
questions, and perhaps coming to different answers about what it means to live
in a universe that will eventually be torn apart. And that was life.
thinkers whose insights move ahead of their age
ReplyDeletehave to pay the price of rejection and loneliness.