If you tell someone from that you’re going to Kansas City to
meet up with some old friends the most common response is an incredulous,
Kansas City? As if you have just told them you are traveling to the moon
because you’ve always loved its color. I discovered this last fall as I was
preparing to leave. It appears that for most people on the east coast, Kansas
City, is less a place, than a place you don’t go. If I’d said Savannah, people
would have commented on the beaches, Chicago or even Denver, perhaps a comment
on the weather and some vague comment about the downtown getting better.
Occasionally, you find someone who’s been to Kansas City, and they will look at
you askance and perhaps tell you that Kansas City is not the New York of
Missouri like you’ve been lead to believe. People are cruel though and not
always to be trusted, though, after so many snide remarks it’s hard to avoid a
sense of foreboding. Why the hell am I going to Kansas City?
I was
headed out to Kansas City for a bachelor party. We decided on Kansas City
because it’s in middle America, and my friends and I are on opposite coasts or
Chicago. We decided to meet in the middle after a democratic voting process
that involves rankings of cities in various orders along with questions, or
synopses if any of the places have been visited or commented on by friends. The
main goal of the city picking process is not to be the one who makes the
ultimate decision. This is primarily because my friends are all very
warm-hearted jerks, who will mercilessly ping the person who picked the city or
the house if anything goes awry. For the record, I wanted to go to Milwaukee.
This
was supposed to be a photo essay. I brought a real camera on a trip for the
first time in my life. I was flush with the power, taking pictures of
everything from behind various windows, metro, plane, car, in the hopes of
capturing the insubstantiality of travel, the being no place. The problem is
that somewhere along the way I lost the camera. The fact is, it had gone dead
anyway after ten or so photos and had ceased being useful to me. I am carless
with things like cameras and feelings.
I’m riding on the metro at 6 AM, a truly awful time to be
riding the metro and a worse time to be dragging your suitcase down the
sidewalk in the dark in order to catch it at 5:30. It felt like the walk of the
damned, though I did see another person at the same time, a cheery woman
walking her dog. That she was cheery is further proof that pet owners are
insane. On the train, I take a picture of the sun, a sphere of orange light
lifting itself between telephone wires, billboards, and old brick buildings. When
I’m riding on the metro I can never decide if the detritus of the city: wires,
bricks, graffiti, burned out buildings are hideously ugly or whether they are
possessed of a transient sort of beauty, look on my works ye mighty and
despair. I wonder if they are monuments of failure, to bring beauty, to
connect, and whether that makes them meaningful.
monuments from a different time and a different generation
ReplyDeletebeauty is in the eye (and mind) of the beholder
will our achievements(??) be appreciated by those from the 22nd century??